Effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block on neuroendocrine stress response and postoperative analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing elective open pyeloplasty – A randomised clinical trial (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Indian J Anaesth
  • v.68(5); 2024 May
  • PMC11100651

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block on neuroendocrine stress response and postoperative analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing elective open pyeloplasty – A randomised clinical trial (1)

HomeCurrent issueInstructionsSubmit article

Indian J Anaesth. 2024 May; 68(5): 467–472.

Published online 2024 Apr 12. doi:10.4103/ija.ija_608_23

PMCID: PMC11100651

Pyarelal Ramsing Rathod, Debesh Bhoi, Ajeet Kumar, Bikash Ranjan Ray, Virender Kumar Mohan, and Lokesh KashyapEffect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block on neuroendocrine stress response and postoperative analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing elective open pyeloplasty – A randomised clinical trial (2)

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

Background and Aims:

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a compartmental block of the anterior abdominal wall. Surgical trauma produces neuroendocrine surgical stress responses, which are modified by anaesthetic blocks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided QLB on analgesia and surgical neuroendocrine stress response in paediatric patients undergoing pyeloplasty.

Methods:

A randomised trial was conducted in 60 children aged 1–7 years undergoing elective open pyeloplasty. Patients were randomised into Group QLB [US-guided QLB with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine after induction of general anaesthesia (GA)], and Group GA, which received only GA. Perioperative haemodynamic parameters, serum cortisol, blood glucose, analgesic consumption and postoperative FLACC scores were recorded. Unpaired t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare variables between the two groups. Two-way analysis of variance or the Friedmann test was used to compare quantitative variables at various points within a group.

Results:

A decrease in serum cortisol and blood glucose values was observed in Group QLB at 30 min after surgical incision and 24 h after surgery compared to the preoperative value and compared to Group GA (P < 0.05). The quality of analgesia assessed by the FLACC scale was significantly better in group QLB. Dose of fentanyl consumption (µg/kg) was higher in Group GA compared to Group QLB in the intraoperative and postoperative period (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

QLB is effective as part of multimodal analgesia and attenuates the neuroendocrine stress in paediatric patients undergoing open pyeloplasty.

Keywords: Analgesia, cortisol, glucose, neuroendocrine surgical stress, pain, pyeloplasty, quadratus lumborum block, regional block

INTRODUCTION

Pyeloplasty is a standard surgical procedure performed for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children and is associated with significant postoperative pain.[1] Neuraxial analgesia and peripheral nerve blockade techniques provide superior analgesia compared to systemic opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.[2] Ultrasound (US)-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has been described as a newer modality truncal block in paediatrics for providing somatic and visceral pain relief after abdominal surgery in both the upper and lower abdomen.[3,4]

Surgical stress contributes to postoperative morbidity and mortality, associated with extreme catecholamine response, which may worsen the outcome. Surgical stress produces sympathetic activation, resulting in immunological, haematological, metabolic and endocrine reactions. Secretion of endogenous catecholamines, glucocorticoids and inflammatory mediators is increased by hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activation following surgical stress.[5] The neuroendocrine stress response is obtunded by epidural, spinal and peripheral nerve blocks.[6]

The current study hypothesises that the US-guided QLB will provide effective analgesia and attenuate the neuroendocrine response of surgical trauma in paediatric open pyeloplasties. The primary outcome was to assess US-guided QLB's effect on modifying the surgical neuroendocrine stress response by measuring serum cortisol and blood glucose levels. The secondary outcomes were the haemodynamic changes in the intraoperative and postoperative period, intraoperative total fentanyl requirement, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scores and total fentanyl requirement in the first 24-h postoperative period and incidence of block-related complications.

METHODS

Following approval by the institutional ethics committee for postgraduate research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (vide approval number IECPG-283/07.09.2017; dated 28/09/2017) and registration at the Clinical Trials Registry-India (vide registration number CTRI/2017/11/010406;http://ctri.nic.in), this randomised, single-blinded interventional study was conducted from October 2017 to May 2019. This study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, revised in 2013, and good clinical practice.

Before enrolment in the study, informed written consent was obtained from the parents of the children or their guardians for their children to participate in the study and for the child's data to be used for research and educational purposes. Sixty patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, aged 1–7 years, of either gender, undergoing open pyeloplasty under general anaesthesia (GA) were included. Exclusion criteria were refusal to give consent, distorted anatomy and infection at the site of block and children with metabolic abnormalities, cardiac disease, sepsis, coagulopathic disorder or hypersensitivity to relevant drugs.

The included patients were randomly allocated using permuted block randomisation into two groups of 30 children each, in which a computer-generated random number list was used to randomise the patients into the following groups based on treatment: Group QLB (n = 30): US-guided QLB with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine after induction of GA and Group GA (n = 30): only GA. The random allocation sequence was concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Once an eligible patient consented, the respective envelope was opened by an anaesthesiologist who was not a part of the study to include the patient in the marked group.

All surgeries were performed in the morning hours to equalise circadian changes in the stress hormone level. On the day of surgery, all children who were >6 months old were premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam 0.05-0.1 mg/kg, 20–30 min before the anticipated time of induction. About 2 ml of the blood sample was taken in a serum separating tube for serum cortisol measurement, and blood glucose level was also measured. Patients were given GA as per the standard protocol. The baseline haemodynamic parameters were noted. In Group QLB, the block was administered 15 min before the start of surgery, in lateral decubitus position, and 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine was deposited in the fascial plane between the quadratus lumborum muscle and the psoas major muscle [Figure 1]. Non-invasive blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide and oxygen saturation were monitored intraoperatively every 5 min and recorded after endotracheal tube intubation, after skin incision, 15 min and 30 min after skin incision and at the end of surgery. A change of more than 20% in haemodynamic parameters in the intraoperative period was considered inadequate analgesia and treated with 0.5 µg/kg IV fentanyl. Also, the number of fentanyl IV boluses was recorded. Again, 2 ml of the blood sample was taken in a serum separating tube for serum cortisol and blood glucose level measurement 30 min after surgical incision.

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block showing LA spread between PM and QLM. Ant = anterior, EO and TA = external oblique and transverse abdominis muscle, ESM = erector spinae muscle, LA = point of local anaesthetic injection, LDM = latissimus dorsi muscle, PC = peritoneal cavity, PM = psoas major muscle, Post = posterior, QLM = quadratus lumborum muscle, TP = tip of transverse process of L4, VB = vertebral body of L4

All the patients were extubated at the end of surgery; 0.1 mg/kg IV ondansetron was administered for antiemetic prophylaxis, and 7.5–15 mg/kg IV paracetamol was administered before extubation and continued sixth hourly in the postoperative period for analgesia. Patients were shifted to post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), where the FLACC scores and haemodynamic parameters were noted at ½, 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, and 24th hour. If the FLACC score was more than 4, rescue analgesia with 0.5 µg/kg IV fentanyl was administered. The block was considered a failure when rescue analgesia was needed within the first 2 h after surgery. The time to first rescue analgesia, the number of fentanyl IV boluses and the total amount of IV fentanyl required were recorded. Complications such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, motor weakness, respiratory distress and block site haematoma formation were also noted. In the postoperative period, serum cortisol and blood glucose levels were measured 30 min and 24 h after surgery.

The sample size was calculated based on the attenuation of neuroendocrine stress response to surgery. Considering the results of parameters (cortisol and glucose) from the earlier published study,[7] that is, serum cortisol level was significantly lower in group transversus abdominis plane (TAP) compared to group GA intraoperatively [17.73 (1.51) vs. 21.80 (2.22) µg/dl] and 30 min postoperatively [15.03 (1.56) vs. 18.30 (1.53) µg/dl] and blood glucose level was significantly lower in group TAP compared to group GA intraoperatively [107.57 (3.77) vs. 115.40 (6.30) mg/dl] and 30 min postoperatively [104.13 (3.78) vs. 110.73 (4.83) mg/dl] at 95% confidence interval and 90% power of the study, the required minimum sample size was very small (eight in each group). Therefore, to derive valid results on considered outcomes between the groups, statistically large number of patients, at least 30 patients, were taken in each group.

Qualitative variables were described as frequency and percentage. A Chi-squared test/Fisher's exact test was used to compare qualitative variables (gender, ASA class) between the two groups. The quantitative variables (serum cortisol, blood glucose, weight, heart rate, blood pressure, total dose of fentanyl requirement, number of IV fentanyl boluses, FLACC score) were described as mean (standard deviation) and/or median (first quartile–third quartile). Unpaired t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare quantitative variables between the two groups. However, to compare quantitative variables within a group at two points in time, a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. If quantitative variables (serum cortisol, blood glucose, heart rate, blood pressure) at a basal point between two groups were comparable (i.e. not significant), they were compared at successive points straightaway. Otherwise, the differences in basal values between the two groups were compared. Two-way analysis of variance or the Friedmann test was used to compare quantitative variables (serum cortisol, blood glucose) at various points within a group. The result was considered statistically significant at a 5% level of significance (P < 0.05). The statistical data were analysed using STRATA 14.0 version and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20.0 version software (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, USA).

RESULTS

We assessed 70 patients for eligibility for possible inclusion in our study. Of these, 60 were included and randomised into two groups, and the study protocol was completed [Figure 2]. Demographic data and baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender and duration of anaesthesia [Table 1]. All patients in both groups belonged to ASA physical status I.

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram showing patient progress through the study phases. GA = general anaesthesia, QLB = quadratus lumborum block

Table 1

Demographic data

Group QLB (n=30)Group GA (n=30)
Age (years)3.59 (2.18)4.16 (2.26)
Gender (male/female)27/326/4
Weight (kg)14.80 (5.82)14.86 (5.60)
Duration of anaesthesia (min)112.83 (17.65)120.33 (22.2)

Open in a separate window

Data expressed as mean (standard deviation) or numbers. GA=general anaesthesia, QLB=quadratus lumborum block

There was a significant decrease in serum cortisol and blood glucose values in Group QLB at 30 min after surgical incision and also at 30 min and 24 h post surgery compared to the preoperative value and in comparison to Group GA [Table 2].

Table 2

Serum cortisol level and blood glucose level

Group QLB (n=30)Group GA (n=30)P1P2P3P4
Serum cortisol (nmol/l)
C1 – Before induction of anaesthesia1056.60 (712.15–1541.71)485.29 (285.76–1041.60)0.003
C2 – 30 min after surgical incision932.83 (476.72–1360.71)1190.80 (701.32–1954.10)0.035<0.001<0.001<0.001
C3 – 30 min after surgery668.37 (437.91–1126.63)1952.22 (1174.41–2711.31)<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
C4 – 24 h after surgery899.29 (508.60–1273.99)807.42 (479.58–1152.21)0.727<0.001<0.001<0.001
Blood glucose (mg/dl)
G1 – Before induction of anaesthesia110.87 (8.59)102.13 (13.71)0.004
G2 – 30 min after surgical incision110.90 (10.30)150.60 (17.69)<0.001>0.05<0.001<0.001
G3 – 30 min after surgery109.00 (12.00)181.60 (18.09)<0.001>0.05<0.001<0.001
G4 – 24 h after surgery105.73 (7.05)107.73 (10.00)0.374<0.001<0.001<0.001

Open in a separate window

Data expressed as median (Q1–Q3) or mean (standard deviation). P1 – Comparison between two groups. P2 – Comparison within Group QLB with the preoperative value within Group QLB, C1 is significantly different from C2, C3, C4 (P<0.05) within Group QLB, G1 is significantly different from G4 (P<0.001). P3 – Comparison within Group GA with the preoperative value within Group GA, C1 is significantly different from C2, C3, C4 (P < 0.05) within Group GA, G1 is significantly different from G2, G3, G4 (P<0.05). P4 – Comparison of changes in value with the preoperative value between the two groups. GA=general anaesthesia, QLB=quadratus lumborum block

The median number of fentanyl boluses (0.5 µg/kg) required in the intraoperative period was 3 (2–3) and 0 (0–0) and in the postoperative period was 2 (1–2) and 0 (0–0) in Group GA and Group QLB, respectively (P = 0.001). The median doses of fentanyl consumption (µg/kg) required in the intraoperative period were 1.74 (1.27–2.13) and 0 (0–0) and in the postoperative period were 1 (0.76–1.33) and 0 (0–0) in Group GA and Group QLB, respectively (P = 0.001) [Table 3].

Table 3

Fentanyl consumption intraoperatively and postoperatively between the groups

ParameterGroup QLB (n=30) Median (Q1–Q3)Group GA (n=30) Median (Q1–Q3)P
Number of fentanyl boluses (0.5 μg/kg)Intraoperative0 (0–0)3 (2–3)0.001
Postoperative0 (0–0)2 (1–2)0.001
Total dose of fentanyl consumption (μg/kg)Intraoperative0 (0–0)1.74 (1.27–2.13)0.001
Postoperative0 (0–0)1 (0.76–1.33)0.001

Open in a separate window

GA=general anaesthesia, QLB=quadratus lumborum block

There was a decrease in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and heart rate in Group QLB compared to the baseline value following surgical incision in the intraoperative period and at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 h in the postoperative period [Figure 3].

Open in a separate window

Figure 3

Patient mean arterial BP (mmHg) in the intraoperative period. P <0.05 at induction, surgical incision, 30 min after surgical incision, end of surgery and extubation. BP = blood pressure, GA = general anaesthesia, QLB = quadratus lumborum block

Mean FLACC scores in Group GA were higher compared to Group QLB in the entire postoperative period [Figure 4]. There were no complications such as postoperative nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, motor weakness, respiratory distress or block site haematoma formation in any of the subjects.

Open in a separate window

Figure 4

Patient mean FLACC score trends between the two groups in the postoperative period. P <0.05 at extubation, 0.5, 2, 4, 8 and 12 h after the surgery. FLACC = Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability, GA = general anaesthesia, QLB = quadratus lumborum block

DISCUSSION

We observed very good analgesia with US-guided QLB with stable haemodynamics and neuroendocrine response. No incision response in the block group correlated with serum cortisol and blood glucose levels, and the effect extended to the postoperative period.

The blunting of the neuroendocrine stress response and blunting of activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis was observed with US-guided QLB.[8] Thus, we observed that QLB provides effective adjuvant analgesia.[9,10]

Nerve blocks significantly suppress the neuroendocrine stress response in the perioperative period.[5,8] US-guided TAP block has been found to provide adequate perioperative analgesia and blunt neuroendocrine stress response in paediatric patients undergoing elective open inguinal hernia repair.[7] However, in pyeloplasty, there is more visceral component of pain, so QLB was preferred over TAP block.[11]

The analgesic efficacy of QLB was also observed in a case series, wherein US-guided QLB with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine provided good analgesia in the postoperative period in children undergoing open pyeloplasty.[3] They used the Wong–Baker Faces scale for pain assessment and administered IV morphine in increments of 50 µg/kg in the postoperative period for rescue analgesia. We obtained similar results and found a decrease in IV fentanyl consumption.

USG-guided QLB was compared with caudal epidural using 1 ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine with 0.03 mg/kg morphine for vesicoureteral reflux surgery in paediatric patients. The authors concluded that QLB was more effective than the caudal epidural in decreasing the need for rescue analgesia during the 24-h postoperative period.[12]

Complications like quadriceps weakness, haematoma associated with allodynia, hyperalgesia and back pain have been reported following QLB in the postoperative period.[13] However, none of our study participants had haematoma, muscle weakness, significant Postoperative nausea and vomiting, urinary retention or respiratory depression.

A few limitations of our study include the following. Due to the nature of interventions, the anaesthesiologist taking intraoperative care of patients in Group GA could not be blinded. Other indicators of stress response, such as serum catecholamine and cytokine levels, were not evaluated. The control group could have received another alternative mode of analgesia, like a caudal block or a placebo. The use of a continuous catheter technique and the use of additives would have increased the duration of analgesia. Future studies may be directed towards redo surgery or more complex pyeloplasty surgery with extensive dissection to prove the analgesic efficacy of QLB.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block with general anaesthesia is a safe and effective alternative mode of analgesia as a component of multimodal analgesia, and it blunts the haemodynamic and neuroendocrine stress response following surgery in children undergoing open pyeloplasty.

Study data availability

De-identified data may be requested with reasonable justification from the authors (email to the corresponding author). After approval, they shall be shared upon request as per the author's institution policy.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge Dr. Sadanand Dwivedi, Professor, Department of Biostatistics, AIIMS, New Delhi, Dr. Archana Singh, Assistant professor, Department of Biochemistry, AIIMS, New Delhi and Dr. Devendra Kumar Yadav, Associate Professor, Department of Paediatric surgery, AIIMS, New Delhi, for helping us in conducting this study.

REFERENCES

1. Gatti JM, Amstutz SP, Bowlin PR, Stephany HA, Murphy JP. Laparoscopic vs open pyeloplasty in children: Results of a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. J Urol. 2017;197:792–7.. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Ponde V. Recent trends in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:746–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Baidya DK, Maitra S, Arora MK, Agarwal A. Quadratus lumborum block: An effective method of perioperative analgesia in children undergoing pyeloplasty. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27:694–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Garg C, Khanna S, Mehta Y. Quadratus lumborum block for post-operative pain relief in patient with Prune belly syndrome. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:840–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Milone M, Desiderio A, Velotti N. Surgical stress and metabolic response after totally laparoscopic right colectomy. Sci Rep. 2021;11:9652. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89183-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Cusack B, Buggy DJ. Anaesthesia, analgesia, and the surgical stress response. BJA Educ. 2020;20:321–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Abu Elyazed MM, Mostafa SF, Abdullah MA, Eid GM. The effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on postoperative analgesia and neuroendocrine stress response in pediatric patients undergoing elective open inguinal hernia repair. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26:1165–71.. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Van Boxstael S, Peene L, Dylst D, Penders J, Hadzic A, Meex I, et al. The effect of spinal versus general anaesthesia on perioperative muscle weakness in patients having bilateral total hip arthroplasty: A single center randomized clinical trial. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28:450. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01435-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Yadav M, Agrawal M, Bansal P, Prateek, Garg MK, Yadav A, et al. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block versus ilioinguinal–iliohypogastric nerve block with wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in unilateral inguinal surgeries: A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:302–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Venkatraman R, Saravanan R, Mohana KV, Pushparani A. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block for post-operative analgesia in unilateral laparoscopic renal surgeries – A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:1007–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Roy A, Bhoi D, Chhabra A, Mohan VK, Darlong V, Prasad G, et al. Quadratus lumborum block vs. transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair of inguinal hernia in adults: A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:207–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Sato M. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block compared to caudal ropivacaine/morphine in children undergoing surgery for vesicoureteric reflux. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019;29:738–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Visoiu M, Pan S. Quadratus lumborum blocks: Two cases of associated hematoma. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019;29:286–8.. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Anaesthesia are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

Effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block on neuroendocrine stress response and postoperative analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing elective open pyeloplasty – A randomised clinical trial (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Catherine Tremblay

Last Updated:

Views: 6445

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Catherine Tremblay

Birthday: 1999-09-23

Address: Suite 461 73643 Sherril Loaf, Dickinsonland, AZ 47941-2379

Phone: +2678139151039

Job: International Administration Supervisor

Hobby: Dowsing, Snowboarding, Rowing, Beekeeping, Calligraphy, Shooting, Air sports

Introduction: My name is Catherine Tremblay, I am a precious, perfect, tasty, enthusiastic, inexpensive, vast, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.